There are three major parts to this assignment.
1. Based on findings from published academic literature, what do your scores on the five personality trait domains suggest about your strengths and weaknesses associated with the job role profile?
When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer:
• Provide a concise summary of the academic literature that has addressed the five personality domains and their expected relationships with the different aspects of the job role.
• Based on your IPIP results are there areas of particular strengths and weaknesses supported by the predicted relationships between personality traits and work performance? Provide examples to substantiate your answer for the relevant trait domains.
2. Using your PSY391 peers as a pool of applicants for this role, how do your scores on the 120- item IPIP by Maples et al. (2014) compare? Which candidate(s) do you think would be a good fit and why?
ARE YOU A STUDENT? Need Assignment Writing Help Online?
Welcome Home - Best Essay Writers and Tutors Available. No ChatGPT. No Plagiarism. CLICK HERE
When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer:
• Provide a standardised statistical indicator (e.g., a Z-score) for each of your five domain scores that allows you to describe how much higher, lower, or approximately average you are on each trait domain in comparison to your PSY391 peers.
3. Based on the SDS scale, what implications might this have you being shortlisted for the role?
Are your responses valid? How might they be interpreted? How else might HR explore the validity of your profile?
When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer:
• How do validity considerations weaken or strengthen the accuracy of your trait domain scores as predictors of job performance? Provide examples to demonstrate that you understand how validity considerations can be directly applied to your data / literature predictions.